СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ МЕТОДЫ АМБУЛАТОРНОГО МОНИТОРИРОВАНИЯ ЭЛЕКТРОКАРДИОГРАММЫ. КЛИНИЧЕСКОЕ ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ

В обзоре представлены клинические характеристики и сравнительные данные применения современных неинвазивных и инвазивного методов амбулаторного мониторирования электрокардиограммы в диагностике нарушений ритма и проводимости сердца. Приведены особенности каждого из методов длительного электрокардиографического мониторирования, эффективность их применения и тактика выбора для улучшения диагностики аритмий и синкопальных состояний в определении диагноза.

сердечная аритмия, синкопальное состояние, электрокардиографическая диагностика, амбулаторное мониторирование электрокардиограммы внутригоспитальное электрокардиографическое мониторирование, холтеровское мониторирование, событийные регистраторы, накладные электрокардиографические мониторы, наружные петлевые регистраторы, имплантируемые петлевые регистраторы, мобильные системы амбулаторного сердечного мониторинга

1. Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope, European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009). Eur Heart J 2009;30(21):2631–71.

2. Всероссийское научное общество по клинической электрофизиологии, аритмологии и кардиостимуляции. Клинические рекомендации по проведению электрофизиологических исследований, катетерной абляции и применению имплантируемых антиаритмических устройств. М.: Новая редакция 2013; 595.

3. Rothman S.A., Laughlin J.C., Seltzer J. et al. The diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: a prospective multi-center randomized study comparing mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event monitoring. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007;18(3):241–7.

4. Raviele A., Giada F., Bergfeldt L., et al. Management of patients with palpitations: а position paper from the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace 2011;13(7):920–34.

5. Drew B.J., Califf R.M., Funk M., et al. Practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Clinical Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: endorsed by the International Society of Computerized Electrocardiology and the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. Circulation 2004;110:2721–46.

6. Национальные рекомендации по определению риска и профилактике внезапной сердечной смерти. Клиническая практика. 2012;(4):1–94.

7. Newby L.K., Hasselblad V., Armstrong P.W. et al. Time-based risk assessment after myocardial infarction. Implications for timing of discharge and applications to medical decision-making. Eur Heart J 2003;24(2):182–9.

8. Al-Khatib S.M., Stebbins A.L., Califf R.M. et al. Sustained ventricular arrhythmias and mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the GUSTO-III trial. Am Heart J 2003;145(3):515–21.

9. Creswell L.L., Schuessler R.B., Rosenbloom M., Cox J.L. Hazards of postoperative atrial arrhythmias. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56(3):539–49.

10. Crawford M.H., Bernstein S.J., Deedwania P.C., et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34(3):912–48.

11. Национальные российские рекомендации по применению методики холтеровского мониторирования в клинической практике. Российский кардиологический журнал 2014;2(106):6–71.

12. Balady G.J., Bufalino V.J., Gulati M. et al. COCATS 4 Task Force 3: Training in Electrocardiography, Ambulatory Electrocardiography, and Exercise Testing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65(17):1763–77.

13. Bass E.B., Curtiss E.I., Arena V.C. et al. The duration of Holter monitoring in patients with syncope. Is 24 hours enough? Arch Intern Med 1990;150(5):1073-8.

14. Soteriades E.S., Evans J.C., Larson M.G., et al. Incidence and prognosis of syncope. N Engl J Med 2002;347(12):878–85.

15. Kligfield P., Gettes L.S., Bailey J.J., et al. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram, part I: the electrocardiogram and its technology: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2007;115(10):1306–24.

16. Sheldon R.S., Morillo C.A., Krahn A.D. et al. Standardized approaches to the investigation of syncope: Canadian Cardiovascular Society position paper. Can J Cardiol 2011;27(2):246–53.

17. WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, Yancy C.W., Jessup M. et al. 2013 ACCF/ AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2013;128(16):e240–327.

18. Mittal S., Movsowitz C., Steinberg J.S. Ambulatory external electrocardiographic monitoring: focus on atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58(17):1741–9.

19. Sivakumaran S., Krahn A.D., Klein G.J. et al. A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope. Am J Med 2003;115(1):1–5.

20. Gladstone D.J., Spring M., Dorian P. et al. Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 2014;370(26):2467–77.

21. Reiffel J.A., Schwarzberg R., Murry M. Comparison of autotriggered memory loop recorders versus standard loop recorders versus standard loop recorders versus 24 hour Holter monitors for arrhythmia detection. Am J Cardiol 2005;95(9):1055–9.

22. Fung E., Järvelin M.R., Doshi R.N. et al. Electrocardiographic patch devices and contemporary wireless cardiac monitoring. Front Physiol 2015;6:149.

23. Saadi D.B., Sørensen H. B. D., Hansen I.H. et al. ePatch® – A Clinical Overview: DTU Orbit – The Research Information System proposals. Annual report year: 2014. Available at http://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/epatch--a-clinicaloverview(5a3e37a2-76a8-4240-aae6781269a8ca2a)/export.html.

24. Tung C.E., Su D., Turakhia M.P. et al. Diagnostic yield of extended cardiac patch monitoring in patients with stroke or TIA. Front Neurol 2015;5:266. DOI: 10.3389/ fneur.2014.00266

25. Medical Policy Cardiac Event Monitors. Effective Date: December 1, 2015: Harvard Pilgrim Health Care proposals Clinical Medical Policies. https://www.harvardpilgrim.org/portal/page?_pageid=253,41745&_dad=portal&_ schema=PORTAL.

26. Ambulatory Cardiac Event Monitoring and Real-Time Outpatient Cardiac Telemetry. Reviewed: June 2015 : Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield Medical Policy Analyst proposals. http://www.wellmark.com/Provider/MedPoliciesAndAuthorizations/MedicalPolicies/policies/Ambulatory_Cardiac.aspx (25.09.2016).

27. Mittal S., Yang E.H., Joshi R., et al. Implantable Loop Recorder: The Heart.org Medscape. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1920236-overview#showall.

28. Shanmugam N., Liew R. The Implantable Loop Recorder — An Important Addition to the Armentarium in the Management of Unexplained Syncope. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2012; 41(3):115–24. PMID: 22538738.

29. Reveal XT programmable parameters. In: REVEAL® XT 9529. Insertable Cardiac Monitor. Clinician Manual. Minneapolis, USA: Medtronic, Inc.; 2007. p. 70–4.

30. Monitor Settings. In: Monitoring Devices Merlin™ Patient Care System. Help Manual For the following devices: SJM Confirm™ Implantable Cardiac Monitor. Sylmar: St. Jude Medical Cardiac Rhythm Management Division, 2008.

31. Brignole M., Sutton R., Menozzi C. et al. Early application of an implantable loop recorder allows effective specific therapy in patients with recurrent suspected neurally mediated syncope. Eur Heart J 2006;27(9):1085–92. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi842. PMID: 16569653.

32. Edvardsson N., Frykman V., van Mechelen R. et al Use of an implantable loop recorder to increase the diagnostic yield in unexplained syncope: results from the PICTURE registry. Europace 2011;13(2):262–9. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euq418. PMID: 21097478.

33. Zimethbaum P., Goldman A. Ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring: сhoosing the right device. Circulation 2010;122(16): 1629–36. DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.109.925610. PMID: 20956237.

34. Angaran P., Klein G.J., Yee R. et al. Syncope. Neurol Clin 2011;29(4):903–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2011.07.005. PMID: 22032666.

35. Barrett P.M., Komatireddy R., Haaser S. et al. Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring. Am J Med 2014;127(1):95.e11–7. DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.003. PMID: 24384108.

36. Sun B.C., Costantino G., Barbic F. et al. Priorities for emergency department syncope research. Ann Emerg Med 2014;64(6):649–55.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.014. PMID: 24882667.

37. Mendu M.L., McAvay G., Lampert R. et al. Yield of diagnostic tests in evaluating syncopal episodes in older patients. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(14):1299–305. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.204. PMID: 19636031.

38. Приказ Минздравсоцразвития РФ от 19.08.2009 N 599н (ред. от 28.04.2011) «Об утверждении Порядка оказания плановой и неотложной медицинской помощи населению Российской Федерации при болезнях системы кровообращения кардиологического профиля»: Консультант Плюс правовая база данных. http:// base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online. cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=115373 [The order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation of August 19, 2009 N 599n "About the statement of the order of rendering planned and emergency medical service to the population of the Russian Federation at diseases of the blood circulatory system of the cardiological profile": Consultant Plus Legal Database proposals. http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=115373 Russ.)].

39. Приказ Министерства здравоохранения и социального развития РФ от 30 декабря 2009 г. N 1044н «Об утверждении Порядка оказания медицинской помощи больным с сердечно-сосудистыми заболеваниями, требующими диагностики или лечения с применением хирургических и/или рентгенэндоваскулярных методов»: Консультант Плюс правовая база данных proposals. http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online. cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=97637 [The order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation of December 30, 2009 N 1044n "About the statement of the order of delivery of health care by the patient with the cardiovascular diseases demanding diagnostics or treatment using surgical and/or rentgenendovaskulyarny methods": Consultant Plus Legal Database proposals. http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online. cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=97637 (In Russ.)].

40. Приказ Министерства здравоохранения РФ № 918н от 15 ноября 2012 г. «Об утверждении порядка оказания медицинской помощи больным с сердечно-сосудистыми заболеваниями»: Гарант Информационно-правовая база proposals. http://ivo.garant.ru/#/document/70299174/paragraph/6:0. [The order of the Ministry of Health of November 15, 2012 № 918n «Approval of the procedure for medical care to patients with cardiovascular diseases»: GARANT Legal Information Database proposals. http://ivo. garant.ru/#/document/70299174/paragraph/6:0. (In Russ.)].

41. Shin T.G., Kim J.S., Song H.G. et al. Standardized approaches to syncope evaluation for reducing hospital admissions and costs in overcrowded emergency departments. Yonsei Med J 2013;54(5):1110–8. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.5.1110. PMID: 23918559.

42. Rockx M.A., Hoch J.S., Klein G.J. et al. Is ambulatory monitoring for ‘‘community-acquired’’ syncope economically attractive? A cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized trial of external loop recorders versus Holter monitoring. Am Heart J 2005;150(5):1065. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.08.003. PMID: 16290999.

43. Krahn A., Klein G.J., Yee R. et al. Randomized assessment of syncope trial: conventional diagnostic testing versus a prolonged monitoring strategy. Circulation 2001;104(1):46–51. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.104.1.46. PMID: 11435336.

44. Iglesias J.F., Graf D., Pascale P. et al. The implantable loop recorder: a critical review. Kardiovaskulare Medizin 2009;12(3):85–93.

45. Goldberger J.J., Johnson N.P., Gidea C. Significance of asymptomatic bradycardia for subsequent pacemaker implantation and mortality in patients >60 years of age. Am J Cardiol 2011;108(6):857–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.04.035. PMID: 21757182.

46. Kenny R.A., Brignole M., Dan G.A. et al. Syncope Unit: rationale and requirement – the European Heart Rhythm Association position statement endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace 2015;17(9):1325–40. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv115. PMID: 26108809.

47. CardioNet, Inc. Enters Into Agreement with UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company Provides Coverage for CardioNet MCOTTM : Business Wire.com proposals. http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20130610006443/en/CardioNetEnters-Agreement-UnitedHealthcare-Insurance-Company. (25.09.2016).

48. Приказ Министерства здравоохранения и социального развития Российской Федерации от 28 октября 2013 г. N 794н. «О внесении изменений в приказ Министерства здравоохранения и социального развития Российской Федерации от 27 декабря 2011 г. N 1664н “Об утверждении номенклатуры медицинских услуг”»: Консультант Плюс правовая база данных proposals. http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=157859&fld=134&dst=1000000001,0&r nd=0.06296242191180657. [The order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation from October 28, 2013 of N 794n About modification of the Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation of December 27, 2011 N 1664n "About the approval of the nomenclature of medical services”: Consultant Plus Legal Database proposals. http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=157859&fld=134&dst=1000000001,0&r nd=0.06296242191180657 (25.09.16) (In Russ.)].