Email this article DISEASE COPING STYLES IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE OR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
- Authors: Galetskayte Y.K.1, Volel B.A.1, Pushkarev D.F.1, Las E.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Mental Health Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
- Issue: Vol 7, No 1 (2013)
- Pages: 21-29
- Section: ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
- Published: 15.07.2014
- URL: https://klinitsist.abvpress.ru/Klin/article/view/38
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8338-2013-1-21-29
- ID: 38
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Objective: to study the types of response to illness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Subjects and methods. The sample consisted of 100 patients (mean age 59.2 ± 14.4 years) from University Clinical Hospital One, I.M. Seche nov First Moscow State Medical University, 57 of whom were treated for RA and 43 were for COPD. All the patients were examined by a psychiatrist, a psychologist, and a therapist. The Beck Depression Inventory, SF-36 quality of life questionnaire, and projective psychological tests were also used.
Results. Three main types of response to illness were identified. The features of aberrant hypochondria were most common in the patients
with COPD (53.3 % (23/43)). In RA, hypochondriacal development as a confrontation with illness was intrinsic to a considerable proportion of patients (42.1 % (24/57)). The common response was hypochondriacal neurosis (health anxiety, organ neurotic and omatoautonomic disorders) that was encountered in 27 % (27/100) in the patients with COPD or RA and more common in those with RA (29.8 % (17/57)). The examination revealed nosogenic depressive reactions in 19.2 % (11/57) of the patients with RA and in 9.3 % (4/43) of those with COPD.
Conclusion. The main types of response to somatic illness in the two chronic diseases similar in their impact on quality of life have been investigated, which may be further used to manage this category of patients.
About the authors
Y. K. Galetskayte
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Russian Federation
B. A. Volel
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of RussiaRussian Federation
D. F. Pushkarev
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of RussiaRussian Federation
E. A. Las
Mental Health Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical SciencesRussian Federation
References
Supplementary files
